RESUMO
In Greece, the provision of mental health shows inefficiencies in remote and inaccessible areas due to the lack of appropriate structures and access to healthcare. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the Mobile Mental Health Units (MMHUs) in Cyclades with and without MMHUs' operation based on Real-World Evidence (RWE). The study population consisted of 724 people who visited the MMHUs of the western and northeastern Cyclades in 2015. The data derived from the patients' medical records of EPAPSY classified by International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. The analysis revealed that 60.9% of the participants were women and the average age was 50.1. 50.4% of the people who visited MMHUs without referral from primary health care professionals and 18.8% with referral. The calculation of effectiveness was based on DALYs (Disability-Adjusted Life Years) and was performed according to the World Health Organization methodology. In the specific population, there are no recorded deaths caused by mental disorders and thus DALYs are equal to Years Lost due to Disability (YLDs) with MMHUs' operation. 18% of the population was diagnosed with mood disorders (F30-F39) and morbidity burden 9.49 (YLDs), while 17.5% of the patients were diagnosed with neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders (F40-F48) and corresponding morbidity burden 4.53 (YLDs). Our results revealed that the effectiveness of MMHUs corresponds to 17.98 Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) averted in 2015. The mood disorders and the neurotic, stress-related disorders have shown a high morbidity burden. Advanced age, non-permanent employment, existence of psychopathology in the family and referral on patients' own will were found to significantly affect the mental health status of the participants. The implementation and expansion of flexible and alternative community-based interventions, such as MMHUs, constitute a best practice both for obtaining higher clinical outcomes and for facing regional inefficiencies related to population's access to healthcare.
